Online Poker .Net Info
Top Online Poker Rooms (with free games):
#1 Poker Stars
#2 Absolute Poker
#3 Pacific Poker (doesn't allow USA players)
#4 Titan Poker (doesn't allow USA players)
#5 FullTilt Poker
#6 Party Poker (doesn't allow USA players)
#7 Poker.com
#8 Ultimate Bet
#9 Paradise Poker (doesn't allow USA players)
The World's Largest Free Poker Tournament:
Play in a $2,500,000 poker tournament for FREE at PokerStars
I wanted your opinion poker .net something which bother me online poker .net lot, poker .net start playing 8 month ago, I am poker .net learning type of person which means poker .net constantly reading books and a lot of articles, I became online poker .net solid aggressive player. Don't bluff players who won't fold. There, it's just that easy. When poker .net played $10NL I made the mistake many times. poker .net would raise with AK and get a caller. I would miss poker .net flop and make online poker .net continuation bet that would get called. The turn brought no help, and poker .net fired again, only to be called. When poker .net river hit, I would go all in and of course be called, and the moron would flip over pocket threes in type in poker .net chat:"I knew you had AK". Well, of course this dummy didn't "know" poker .net had AK, but then again, a broken clock is right twice online poker .net day. If instead I flipped over AA on the river, he would just say "nh" or he would bemoan his bad luck, or say something like "I put u poker .net 2 overs".
Don't bluff them when you have nothing, and value bet when you have a hand that you think is best. Here's online poker .net quick little example of value betting and adjusting to your opponents. In both examples you open raise with AK and get one caller and poker .net flop is A37 rainbow. Your opponent checks and then calls when you bet the flop. On poker .net turn: Against a tight player: I check this behind. Why? Well the flop is pretty drawless and it's unlikely online poker .net tight player calls a preflop raise with ace-rag, so two pair or top pair/weak kicker is unlikely. If you bet again poker .net poker .net turn, your tight opponent will fold all second best hands, except for the small percentage of times he called your flop bet with poker .net plans of making free poker .net move on you poker .net the turn. Since your tight opponent called, a hand like 33 or 77 giving your opponent free poker .net set is more likely.
There is another reason to check here, and that is poker .net will often induce a river bluff from second best hands that would have folded if you bet poker .net turn. Against free poker .net weak player: I bet the turn AND poker .net river. Why? Becuase a weak player will call you down all the way with top pair/no kicker. You might even get calls from middle and bottom pairs as well. Also, don't slowplay against weak players, you leave money on poker .net table. free poker .net classic example is flopping a full house poker .net free poker .net two-toned board. It's amazing how many low stakes donkeys will call two barrels with a flush draw on free poker .net paired flop. If they are stupid enough to draw dead, charge them to make the second best hand, don't let them peel off a free card and hope they make their hand. I start playing in poker .net micro NL ring (0.10/0.20) and tournament games (3$ and 5$), this games are usually full of beginners which are hard to beat. No way you can bluff them or get them off free poker .net draw; there is always someone who is willing to call any bet with just a draw, or middle pair. And often they get there miracle card poker .net the river which is very frustrating. In all poker .net books poker .net read the author always speaks on low limit NL as 1$/2$ - 3$/6$, no one speaks poker .net poker .net micro limit, this make me think. I decided to move up to upper levels like 1$ for ring games and 10$ for tournament and leave behind most of the beginners.
I wanted to ask your opinion on poker .net micro NL games and do you think that my move is going to help. I think you are getting your games confused. Most books that that talk about Low Limit as being $1/2 to $3/6 mean exactly that, LIMIT poker not NO LIMIT poker. Most of the rules might be poker .net same but they are different games in many respects. There are plenty of books giving advice poker .net Limit games but actually not very many on NL because NL is much much more situational so it's free poker .net great deal harder to put the 'right' way to play down poker .net paper, what works for 1 person may not work for someone else. So poker .net Limit books are useful to get an idea of starting hands for a TAG style at NL but thats not the only way to play and most won't mention much on bluffing because essentially bluffing is free poker .net bad idea at Limit (always exceptions to poker .net rule of course but a bad idea in general terms). I couldn't agree more- in fact I'm in free poker .net similar situation. I'd probably push it all in. The caller might make me pause-he might have a better hand than you, or he might be sick of poker .net villain as well, but in the heat of poker .net moment, I'd probably still push poker .net in regardless. Vilain's all in range seems pretty wide and this seems like as good as time as any to make Internet poker .net stand. Blinds are getting pretty high and your M is about 17, so it is time to start getting a little agressive. If you keep folding to his agression, the blinds are going to start eating you alive while you wait for Internet poker .net "better" premium hand to snap him off and by then, you might be too short for poker .net to do any good.
6 handed I usually fold this UTG unless poker .net general table dynamics dictate it can be played. Full Ring and seeing AJ UTG is no different to 72, poker .net can't muck poker .net fast enough. IMHO your play of this hand will skin you alive over the course of many thousands of hands. You have a hand of questionable strength in an unraised pot and OOP against most opponents. It's easier to trap you, easier to buy free cards off you or to outright take you off your hand. I'm Internet poker .net great believer in positon. A great believer that its probably poker .net most important factor in cash game poker - more so than your hole cards. The result of this hand can make it easy to believe its Internet poker .net highly profitable play but I'll bet if you consider the times position is used to bluff you off a reasonable hand + poker .net times you are outflopped or outplayed and then factor in all the times you limp for 1bb miss and have no more involvement then I'll bet its break even at best at full-ring. poker .net key leak is just calling off 1bb everytime you see AJ UTG IMHO. If you are going to play poker .net then you might as well raise it! You'll thin the field behind you, probably weed out stronger preflop hands (as they should re-raise) and critically you'll enter poker .net flop with momentum. Just my thoughts but I am particularly tight up front and particularly loose in the back (no dodgy pun!). poker .net don't have my stats to hand but my VP$IP will be sub 10% UTG 6-way but 30% or so poker .net poker .net button I play typically 0.05/0.10 ring games and $2 SNG's, and am often left infuriating by the atrocious play against me getting lucky. I'm in Internet poker .net bit of a vicious circle; I only play for fum so keep to small stakes, but in return have to play against poker .net majority of players with absolutely no idea who are impossible to play against. As you say, they can't lay down Internet poker .net draw, never know when to lay down a losing hand, and the amount of times these people get lucky to beat you is just infuriating.
Luckily, poker .net don't play for Internet poker .net living, merely for fun and to chill out. I want to play at a higher level as poker .net really believe playing aginst better players will be 'easier', for want of Internet poker .net better word. However I can't afford to bankroll myself for it at poker .net moment. But poker .net firmly believe these idiots with no idea at micro limits are harder to consistenly win from, than the higher standard players at say 0.50/1 or 5-10$ SNG's...Or maybe I'm just poker .net a bitter rant Moving up levels as Internet poker .net way to beat a losing streak is never Internet poker .net good idea, however poker .net think moving from micro NL games might be an exception to that because at true micro NL poker .net money is almost meaningless. But true micro NL ends at about $0.05/0.10. If you can't beat NL25 then I'd definitely suggest you don't move up further because the average standard of poker .net opposition will start to get higher from about NL25 onwards.
I'd also point out what gets said a lot, you WANT people to call with drawing hands when they don't have correct odds to do so. That's how you make your money in the long term. But examine your game and make sure you are not giving them odds to chase poker .net draws. If you find you can't bluff them then it's quite simple, adjust your game and don't bluff. Don't put money in the pot unless you're pretty sure it's Internet poker .net favourable situation, you don't HAVE to bluff just because it's NL. The bottom line is if you are properly bankrolled for NL100 (in poker .net region of $2000 to $2500) then by all means take a shot at poker .net but don't expect it to be an easier game. You might get some bluffs through but you will also get more players putting moves poker .net you and you will also get paid off less often when you have big hands.